Domestic Surveillance Controversy Supports Policy Debate

Domestic Surveillance Controversy: Should the United States substantially curtail its domestic surveillance? (National Debate Topic)

SUPPORTERS ARGUE

The legal basis for collecting phone and internet data is weak. The benefits of bulk collection do not outweigh the threat to privacy, liberty, and democracy.

OPPONENTS ARGUE

Wanton privacy violations are not happening under this carefully regulated program. Adding more limits on domestic surveillance is a mistake that could cost lives.

How to Engage Your Students in Debate

Let your students review the facts and decide for themselves: Should the United States substantially curtail its domestic surveillance? Be sure to check out Issues & Controversies’ complete and unbiased coverage of this issue.

Start the discussion with two thought-provoking debate videos: Better More Domestic Surveillance Than Another 9/11: A Debate and Spy on Me, I’d Rather Be Safe: A Debate. These Oxford-style debates by top scholars and experts feature clear “For the Motion” and “Against the Motion” sections that will inspire critical thinking and class discussion.

Issues & Controversies is an ideal resource for research papers, debate preparation, and persuasive writing assignments. This valuable database helps researchers understand today’s crucial issues by exploring hundreds of hot topics in politics, government, business, society, education, and popular culture.